Market Commentary

2025 Hedge Fund Industry Performance through Q3

Global industry and strategy-specific returns through 2025

Posted on
Read time
5 minutes

tl;dr – Hedge funds are having an extremely strong 2025 so far across a variety of strategies, and global hedge fund AUM tracks to exceed $5 trillion USD by end of year.

Overview

While in some years, the hedge fund industry underperforms the broader market, this year, hedge funds have posted extremely strong returns. The S&P 500 is up 14.8% through Q3 of 2025, and the HFRI Asset Weighted IWS Composite (“HFRI IWS Composite”) shows strategy-weighted returns of 8.04% for the same period. It is generally the case that the HFRI IWS Composite reflects a significantly lower return than the S&P 500, since strategies that benchmark against the S&P reflect only a portion of the HFRI IWS Composite.

Notably, according to data from Citco, which administers north of $2T in assets (disclaimer: not all hedge fund class), multi-strategy funds have returned on average 19.3%; equities funds have returned on average 17.1%, and global macro funds have returned on average 15.8%. On the other hand, it’s been a challenging year for commodities funds (-1.5%) and event-driven strategies (0.4%), which is perhaps unsurprising given tariff and trade policy related volatility and force majuere style events.

Source: Citco

This data lines up with what Repool is seeing internally as well across its emerging manager heavy base of funds; 2025 looks to be a record year for our client funds, with multiple funds with returns in excess of 30% year-to-date.

Institutional Performance

According to data compiled by Reuters, institutional asset managers are generally posting strong returns in line with the broader industry trend; this is particularly impressive because, of course (a) driving such returns with large capital bases is significantly more challenging, and (b) in general – without seeing the data itself – it would be reasonable to assume that these firms, on average, have relatively lower risk profiles than the general market.

Naturally, the data published by Reuters does not break down each firm’s underlying strategy performance, and many of the fund returns shown above are the aggregate of pod-style strategies, in which a fund’s net return is the blended output of several or even dozens of individual trading pods and desks, each running a unique portfolio and strategy. If such data were easily available, it would be reasonable to assume that the stronger performers intrafund would tend to reflect a return profile in the same directional vein as Citco has reported.

Of the notable top performers in Reuter’s list, general firm profiles are as follows:

  • Bridgewater Pure Alpha (26.2%) – Global macro, systematic, highly diversified across a variety of assets (i.e., stocks, bonds, currencies, and commodities), seeks uncorrelated returns.
  • EDL Capital (29.86%) – Global macro, discretionary, with particular expertise in currencies and geopolitical impact. Long EU currency in 2025.
  • Pershing Square (23.2%) – Equity, activist, concentrated, long-term. Historically only holds a dozen or so names at a given time.
  • Two Seas Global Fund (29.5%) – Harder to find information on, but seems event-driven, which would make it a standout performer in the category.

Capital Flows

Alternative assets such as credit and venture dominate headlines and prominence, and common narrative suggests that the hedge fund industry is losing its shine, but these are an incomplete description of industry trends. It would be more accurate to say that other asset classes are growing at record rates, but the hedge fund industry continues to grow significantly – as it generally always has.

There are trends with respect to consolidation of funds, certainly, and we would point at a hollowing out of the “middle”; emerging managers continue to launch and grow, and the larger firms gobble up mid-sized managers. Likely, this is due to two factors: (a) the infrastructure required to deliver strong returns past a certain threshold of capital; and (b) the strength of compensation that larger firms are able to offer today.

A small manager team with $500-$1B AUM begins to run into the same alpha generation and capacity constaints as bigger firms, generally, but lacks the wide array of purpose built technology and infrastructure that its bigger peers have. At the same time, these bigger peers can run rate compensation that is substantially similar to if these such firms remained independent; as such, many of these firms find themselves in a challenging trough.

In any case, the hedge fund industry, according to data from HFR and Bloomberg, has already hit $5 trillion in assets, up from just under $2 trillion in 2010, which means a nearly 10% yearly growth rate for the last 15 years.

Source: Bloomberg and HFR.

Repool Thoughts

While 2025 has been a strong year so far, and that trend has continued through October, two months remain, and increasingly, more and more analysts and industry peers warn of a pull-back. Warnings of this kind tend to increase in most macro cycles when the market is posting continunous strong returns, and there are a variety of unique qualitities behind the 2025 market surge, particularly with respect to AI and Mag7 concentration.

Emerging managers should be careful not to over-read into their own returns YTD as compared to larger peers, given that they should tend to have an easier time generating alpha on a risk-adjusted basis with a significantly lower capital base. Moreover, although certainly not necessarily, emerging managers may lack the hedging sophistication and decaes-long experience of larger firms to skillfully navigate a sudden draw down or market correction event.

Repool’s own experience suggests that smaller funds generally fare worse during market drawdowns as compared to larger funds; in part, this is also because their unit economics are more fragile and cannot bear redemptions as easily as larger funds. In any bubbly-looking market condition, we encourage managers to spend a non-trivial amount of time forecasting various possible draw-down scenarios in the coming 6-12 months and ensure that they have implemented the approrpiate risk-management and hedging strategies to account for possible turmoil.

Sources:

https://www.businessinsider.com/hedge-funds-pace-banner-year-multistrategy-multimanager-firms-2025-10

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/how-hedge-funds-performed-september-2025-10-03/

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-23/hedge-fund-assets-hit-5-trillion-most-inflows-since-before-financial-crisis

Looking for modern launch or backoffice solutions?

Disclaimer

Repool, Inc. (“Repool”) serves as an administrator to various pooled investment vehicles.  The content on this site, or any associated distribution platforms and public Repool online social media accounts, platforms, and site (collectively, “Distribution Channels”), is provided for information and discussion purposes only, and should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as legal, business, tax, investment, or other advice. Repool’s services and information available on Distribution Channels are not a substitute for third-party professionals (including properly licensed and/or registered lawyers, brokers and tax professionals), and you should seek your own professional advisers, including legal counsel. Repool is not licensed to provide legal advice and is not registered as a broker-dealer or investment adviser, and Repool is not otherwise licensed or registered.

Any views expressed in posted content, such as articles, blogposts, commentary, videos, or social media, are those of individual Repool personnel or third-party authors and are not the views of Repool or our affiliates, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Additionally, with respect to any content or views available on Distribution Channels, Repool makes no representations that the information has been validated by independent, licensed third-parties, nor that such information has any enduring accuracy or appropriateness for any given individual or situation.

Laws and regulations applicable to the sale of securities, forming pooled investment vehicles (including private funds), and investment management (including serving as an investment adviser or commodity trading advisor) are complicated and occasionally ambiguous. Relevant law may come from the state, federal, or international level, and you may be under the regulatory oversight of one or many regulatory bodies such as, but not limited to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It is your responsibility to ensure that, when forming, offering interests of and managing any pooled investment vehicle, whether supported by Repool’s administrative services or not, you are in material compliance with applicable laws including obtaining any and all applicable licenses, permits, registrations, memberships, and approvals that are required in order to form, offer securities of and manage such pooled investment vehicle.  You should not rely upon Repool in making any such determinations or as a replacement for licensed, third-party professionals.

Building the future of fund services

© 2025. Repool, Inc.