Virginia

Repool Grade
B

Last updated: 11/18/2024

Exemption framework?

Yes - NASAA model rule

Minimum investor type

Qualified client

Audit required?

Yes

Nonstandard requirements

No

Disclaimer

Information herein is provided for informational purposes only and may contain inaccuracies, does not purport to be an exhaustive explanation, and is not a substitute for legal counsel.
Virginia

Summary

Private fund advisers in VA

Virginia has a standard private fund adviser exemption framework modeled after the “NASAA model rule,” one of the most common exemption frameworks in the country.  Emerging hedge fund managers in VA will be restricted in all cases to investors that are “qualified clients” in addition to being accredited, and must also have their fund(s) undergo an annual third-party audit.

Exempt adviser criteria in Virginia

Investor restrictions

Investors in a hedge fund run by a VA-based manager must be "qualfied clients" in addition to being accredited.

Reporting requirements

Notice filing with VA by way of Form ADV is requireed.

Audit requirements

An annual, third-party audit is required of each fund managed by a VA-based manager.

State-specific nuances

None; VA has adopted the NASAA model rule outright.

Detailed Summary

Virginia doesn’t have a particularly prominent hedge fund industry, but, similar to Maryland and DC, still has some amount of hedge fund presence, owing to many financial firms having presence in DC and a decent number of transplants from more prominent hub states.

Despite it’s relative non-prominence, Virginia is a perfectly viable locale for many emerging managers owing to its adoption of the “NASAA model rule,” the most common exemption framework used nationally (and explained further below).  The restrictions that apply to an exempt reporting adviser (an “ERA”) and a registered investment adviser (an “RIA”) in Virginia are similar from a high-level perspective; naturally, however, an ERA has significantly less administrative and dollar costs as compared to an RIA.

The NASAA Model Rule for exempt advisers:

The most common exemption framework is called the “NASAA model rule.”  This is an exemption framework created by the North American Securities Adminstrator’s Association in collaboration with state-level legislators.  Of the states with exemption frameworks, many have elected to adopt the NASAA model rule essentially outright and/or on a modified basis.

In the NASAA model rule¹, advisers exclusively to private funds are able to be exempt from being required to become RIAs with their state (note that regardless, non-VC private fund advisers must become RIAs with the SEC/federally once they manage $150m+ in assets, so exemption is not possible indefinitely), subject to certain criteria.  There are a variety of criteria, much of which is important but likely a non-issue for most emerging managers (e.g. it is not available to certain “bad actors” or folks with certain prior securities violations, standard filings need to be completed, disclosures need to be given to investors, etc).

The two most subjectively notable requirements are:

  1. Investors in exempt manager-managed private funds must be “qualified clients,” ($2.2m+ net worth) and not merely accredited investors.
  2. An annual audit is required per each fund (generally within 120 days of calendar year close) and the results must be distributed to investors.

Both of these requirements match those of RIAs for private funds (i.e. RIAs are also restricted to qualified clients in pooled capital vehicles that charge performance-based fees and must have each of their funds undergo an annual, third-party audit).  However, ERAs have significantly less requirements in other respects, such as record-keeping, custody, policies and procedures, etc.

The adviser and fund-level filings with the SEC and/or applicable states are generally outsourced, and, if a provider like Repool is utilized, a relative non-issue.  The disclosures requirements are handled by way of a quality set of standard hedge fund offering documents, such as those that Repool creates in the course of our fund-in-a-box offerings.

Thus, assuming (1) and (2) above can be met, and there is less than $150m at play across the fund(s) in question, a private fund adviser can be exempt under the NASAA model rule and states that follow its framework.

Virginia’s Exemption Framework:

While many states adopt a NASAA model rule-like framework, Virginia has adopted the NASAA model rule essentially in its entirety.  Therefore, the above mentioned restrictions accurately describe considerations for private fund managers seeking to be exempt in Virginia.

Conclusion:

So long as an emerging manager is able to raise its capital goals exclusively from investors that are qualified clients in addition to being accredited, and have sufficient minimum capital to support the additional cost implications of an annual audit, most such emerging managers based in Virginia will be able to avoid registration and instead operate as exempt.

Naturally, there are still a wide variety of administrative and regulatory filing obligations to consider, as launching a private fund is far from a trivial task, but Repool’s fund-in-a-box can significantly simplify matters and make operating a fund as an Virginia based emerging manager as simple as possible, allowing managers to launch quickly and focus primarily on fundraising and investing.

References

Looking for modern launch or backoffice solutions?

Disclaimer

Repool, Inc. (“Repool”) serves as an administrator to various pooled investment vehicles.  The content on this site, or any associated distribution platforms and public Repool online social media accounts, platforms, and site (collectively, “Distribution Channels”), is provided for information and discussion purposes only, and should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as legal, business, tax, investment, or other advice. Repool’s services and information available on Distribution Channels are not a substitute for third-party professionals (including properly licensed and/or registered lawyers, brokers and tax professionals), and you should seek your own professional advisers, including legal counsel. Repool is not licensed to provide legal advice and is not registered as a broker-dealer or investment adviser, and Repool is not otherwise licensed or registered.

Any views expressed in posted content, such as articles, blogposts, commentary, videos, or social media, are those of individual Repool personnel or third-party authors and are not the views of Repool or our affiliates, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Additionally, with respect to any content or views available on Distribution Channels, Repool makes no representations that the information has been validated by independent, licensed third-parties, nor that such information has any enduring accuracy or appropriateness for any given individual or situation.

Laws and regulations applicable to the sale of securities, forming pooled investment vehicles (including private funds), and investment management (including serving as an investment adviser or commodity trading advisor) are complicated and occasionally ambiguous. Relevant law may come from the state, federal, or international level, and you may be under the regulatory oversight of one or many regulatory bodies such as, but not limited to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It is your responsibility to ensure that, when forming, offering interests of and managing any pooled investment vehicle, whether supported by Repool’s administrative services or not, you are in material compliance with applicable laws including obtaining any and all applicable licenses, permits, registrations, memberships, and approvals that are required in order to form, offer securities of and manage such pooled investment vehicle.  You should not rely upon Repool in making any such determinations or as a replacement for licensed, third-party professionals.

Building the future of fund services

© 2024. Repool, Inc.