The Securities Act of 1933

Quick Definition

The Securities Act governs how entities may offer their securities to investors in the United States, and is one of the three key regulatory frameworks to consider for all hedge funds. Most commonly, hedge funds offer their securities in accordance with Rule 506(b) or 506(c) under Regulation D of the act.

What to know about the Securities Act of 1933


Any fund that brings on third-party investors is generally considered to be offering a security to those investors implicitly by the act of bringing them into the fund, regardless of the specific construction of the fund, the strategy or assets in which it invests, or the offering terms of the fund.  Anytime a security is offering in the United States, whether from within or outside, it must be offered in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act” or “Act“).

Alongside the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Securities Act is one of the three most common considerations for hedge funds, and uniquely, it applies to funds of all asset classes, including those which do not invest in securities.

Key provisions of the Act:

A practical summary of the Act is as follows: whenever an investment opportunity is being offered, generally of any kind and in any form, the offering must either become a registered securities offering or fall within an exemption from registration.

For hedge funds, the two most pertinent sections of the Act are generally Regulation D and Section 4(a)(2).  Both of these pieces of the Act provide for exemption frameworks for securities offerings, which impose restrictions on how an offering may be conducted but in so satisfying such critera may avoid registration.

Section 4(a)(2) vs Reg D

4(a)(2) allows offerings that are not public or widely distributed (also known as “private placements“) to be exempt from registration.  4(a)(2) can quickly become a rabbithole, as whether or not a private placement is acceptable or not is per-offering facts and circumstances based, with general guidelines and case law precedents, rather than absolute science.  For example, while the Act says that public offerings must be registered, exactly when an offering is considered a public offering is not explicitly defined. Despite the lack of absolute definition, there is a sense of “you know it when you see it” that regulators tend to apply.  Generally, though, the intent is that placements are limited in number of investors, non-public, and given to investors that are suitable, knowledgable, and appropriately aware of risk.

If the above seems a bit vague to you, you’re not alone, and Regulation D was introduced to provide for some absolute clarity.  Regulation D provides “safe harbor” private placement types that definitely qualify as acceptable, non-public, private placements under Section 4(a)(2).

Put another way, while 4(a)(2) as a standalone doesn’t clearly define an acceptable private placement, Regulation D does define several.

As such, most hedge funds seek to follow a well-established “safe harbor Reg D offering under 4(a)(2).”

Regulation D Safe Harbor offerings:

The two most common Reg D safe harbor offerings are known as Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). See the more detailed, dedicated articles linked herein for more detailed information about each.

To briefly summarize, 506(b) generally restricts investors to being at minimum accredited investors and restricts the offering from any general solicitation.  506(c) also generally restricts investors to being accredited investors, but does allow for general solicitation, at the cost of an much higher burden of verifying the accreditation and financial status of each investor coming into the fund, which can be costly and undesirable for either or both the fund and prospective investors.  Both these offerings generally pair with the restrictions of the Investment Company Act – and even funds which do not participate in trading securities tend to follow the investor count guidelines of that act – and are therefore further capped at either 100 investors or 2000 investors, depending on whether the 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) exemption is utilized.

Lastly, note that private placements are self-executing, which is to say that there is no application or approval process.  Similar to driving under the speed limit in a car, there is no process associated; however, failure to offer a suitable private placement can subject a fund to severe adverse regulatory action upon inspection.


The Securities Act is extremely important, but also relatively straightforward.  For most funds, the fund must simply comply with one of Regulation D’s safe harbor frameworks when they conduct their offerings to investors, and the most common offering type is a 506(b) offering in conjunction with the investor count restrictions from the Invesment Company Act’s Section 3(c)(1), which caps the number of investors at 100.

Want to gain access to new and diverse fund managers?

Become an investor

Looking for modern launch or backoffice solutions?


Repool, Inc. (“Repool”) serves as an administrator to various pooled investment vehicles.  The content on this site, or any associated distribution platforms and public Repool online social media accounts, platforms, and site (collectively, “Distribution Channels”), is provided for information and discussion purposes only, and should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as legal, business, tax, investment, or other advice. Repool’s services and information available on Distribution Channels are not a substitute for third-party professionals (including properly licensed and/or registered lawyers, brokers and tax professionals), and you should seek your own professional advisers, including legal counsel. Repool is not licensed to provide legal advice and is not registered as a broker-dealer or investment adviser, and Repool is not otherwise licensed or registered.

Any views expressed in posted content, such as articles, blogposts, commentary, videos, or social media, are those of individual Repool personnel or third-party authors and are not the views of Repool or our affiliates, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Additionally, with respect to any content or views available on Distribution Channels, Repool makes no representations that the information has been validated by independent, licensed third-parties, nor that such information has any enduring accuracy or appropriateness for any given individual or situation.

Laws and regulations applicable to the sale of securities, forming pooled investment vehicles (including private funds), and investment management (including serving as an investment adviser or commodity trading advisor) are complicated and occasionally ambiguous. Relevant law may come from the state, federal, or international level, and you may be under the regulatory oversight of one or many regulatory bodies such as, but not limited to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It is your responsibility to ensure that, when forming, offering interests of and managing any pooled investment vehicle, whether supported by Repool’s administrative services or not, you are in material compliance with applicable laws including obtaining any and all applicable licenses, permits, registrations, memberships, and approvals that are required in order to form, offer securities of and manage such pooled investment vehicle.  You should not rely upon Repool in making any such determinations or as a replacement for licensed, third-party professionals.

Building the future of fund services

© 2024. Repool, Inc.