CryptoMarket TrendsPrimer

The $40 Billion Terra (LUNA) Crash Explained


Strategy at Repool, ex-Goldman Sachs Trader, Wharton MBA

Posted on
Read time
5 minutes

Understanding the $40 Billion Terra (LUNA) Crash

In theory, algorithmic stablecoins are a Decentralized Finance dream come true. Unlike trust based stablecoins, algorithmic stablecoins use little to no collateral.

*Sounds sweet* But wait, how would that work?

Today we’re going to cover two major types of algo stablecoins: rebase (e.g. AMP) and seigniorage (e.g. Terra).

Let’s start with an easy one.

What is a rebase stablecoin?

A rebase stablecoin uses an elastic token as its stablecoin.

Elastic tokens have built-in smart contracts that grow and shrink total token supply to support the peg value.

When elastic tokens mint/burn supply, holders receive/lose a pro-rata number of tokens, keeping their overall percentage of ownership and portfolio value constant.

A rebase stablecoin adjusts the number of tokens in circulation so that the value of the stablecoin is always near or at its peg.

Let’s check out AMP, the largest rebase stablecoin by market cap.

As AMP’s price goes above its peg, more AMP is issued. As AMP’s price goes below its peg, AMP is burned.

As AMP’s price fluctuates, AMP supply contracts and expands to try and return its price back to its peg. AMP is currently trading around 80 cents.


So if AMP has been stuck around $0.80, then why isn’t supply dropping more?

AMP is pegged to the 2019 dollar +/- five percent. We may have had just a touch of inflation since then, so the peg is really between $0.83 to $0.92.

If AMP’s closing price is in this range, there is no rebase that night.

Easy enough, right? The main focus here is how elastic tokens work, as they play a key role in regulating Terra — a seigniorage stablecoin.

What is a Seigniorage Stablecoin?

Seigniorage stablecoins use profits from minting new coins to pay for programs aimed at growing stablecoin adoption and supporting the peg.

Seigniorage is the difference between the face value and the cost of minting coins. Seigniorage stablecoins use these profits to pay for fiscal activities in their respective crypto economies.


You’ll notice what people commonly refer to as “Terra” is actually two tokens — Terra and Luna.

Note: These tokens have been rebranded as TerraClassic (LUNC) and TerraUSDClassic (USTC), not to be confused with the new Terra project that is being launched under the ticker LUNA.

Why does Terra have two tokens?

Unlike AMP, Terra’s system has two assets: a stablecoin and LUNA, an elastic token. Terra’s USD stablecoin was originally called UST.

LUNA was a regular cryptocurrency that Terra’s smart contracts used to create and destroy UST.

The Terra smart contract burns $1 worth of LUNA for every 1 UST created, and mints $1 worth of LUNA for every UST burned. This guaranteed exchange rate helps support Terra’s peg.


As such, LUNA’s price was free-floating, reaching a high of $119 before the crash.

As LUNA is an unpegged cryptocurrency, its price is extremely volatile, rising from the low teens to almost $120, back down to zero in the past year.

What drove LUNA’s valuation?

Terra uses Proof-of-Stake, whereby miners stake LUNA to earn rewards. Larger stakes translate into a higher likelihood of being chosen as validator and receiving rewards.

Terra’s platform also gave miners a boost by burning about half of the LUNA received in seigniorage, which increased LUNA’s scarcity.

These processes incentivized investors to hold LUNA and drove valuations.

How did LUNA and UST work together?

Terra acted like a central government by using LUNA to adjust fiscal policy and control UST’s peg.

In the graphic below, think of LUNA as tax revenue/government spending, and UST’s peg as a measure of growth in the Terra economy.

Fiscal policy refers to adjustments in government spending and taxation in order to encourage growth (fiscal stimulus) or combat inflation (fiscal tightening) in the economy.


To stimulate growth (boost UST’s price), Terra spent LUNA and burned UST. To combat inflation (lower UST’s price), Terra burned LUNA and spent UST.

Furthermore, anyone could redeem 1 LUNA for $1 worth of UST, or 1 UST for $1 worth of LUNA — this encouraged market arbitrageurs to support the peg.

When the value of UST’s peg rose above $1, arbitrageurs could make a risk-free profit by swapping 1 LUNA for $1 worth of UST. Terra’s algorithm would also burn LUNA and issue UST to bring the peg lower.


Of course, the arbitrage worked both ways, to support and weaken the peg.

When the value of UST’s peg fell below $1, arbitrageurs could make a risk-free profit by swapping 1 UST for $1 worth of LUNA. Terra’s algorithm would also issue LUNA and burn UST to bring the peg higher.


Now we know why people bought LUNA and how LUNA was used to support UST prices. But there’s still a big elephant in the room.

What drove UST’s valuation?

If there was no collateral backing UST, how did Terra get people to believe UST is worth anything but zero in the first place?

At one point, the UST/LUNA ecosystem was valued at nearly $60B — a far cry from zero.

UST and LUNA’s combined market cap grew at a meteoric rate from tens of millions to 60 billion at its April peak.


What’s a surefire way to get people to buy something? Pay them a lot of money to do it.

Meet the Anchor Protocol. The Anchor Protocol is a lending platform on the Terra blockchain that allows users to stake their UST and earn up to 20% APY.

Prior to the crash, 76% of the total UST in circulation was deposited on the Anchor Protocol.

Clearly, this was a huge incentive to buy and hold UST.

How did Terra fail?

There’s a huge vulnerability in this system.

Since UST’s peg is purely supported by LUNA supply, technically LUNA is UST’s collateral.

If LUNA’s volatility is too high, investors begin to lose confidence in the system and sell their LUNA, increasing LUNA supply. Panic selling causes more investors to bail, hyper-inflating LUNA supply, which devalues UST’s collateral and ends in a permanent de-peg.

This is called a death spiral.

Terra’s ecosystem was extremely vulnerable to the death spiral, where panic selling induces an irreversible drop in prices.

As Terra scrambled to reinstate UST’s peg, it minted more and more LUNA.

In the end, LUNA supply spiked 1,911,427 percent. Hyperinflation drove LUNA’s price to rock bottom, resulting in an irreversible death spiral.

The Beginning of the End

On May 8th, records showed $2.3B out of $14B in UST deposits were pulled from the Anchor Protocol. By the end of the week, $12.2B was gone.

The Anchor Protocol saw a mass exodus of UST investors over a very short period of time, which likely triggered the Terra death spiral.

As massive withdrawals and liquidations in UST commenced, UST’s price dropped. Sensing this, Terra printed more LUNA to buy back UST and try to save the peg.

In the end, UST lost its peg on May 9th, and has been de-pegged ever since.


On June 8th, the NY Department of Financial Services released new regulation specifically targeting stablecoins.

The stablecoin must be fully backed by a Reserve of assets, meaning that the market value of the Reserve is at least equal to the nominal value of all outstanding units of the stablecoin as of the end of each business day.[6]

In effect, algorithmic stablecoins are now outlawed in New York, a decidedly bearish indicator.

While regulation still has a long ways to go, implosions like this should be a major wake up call to investors of all sophistication levels.

As always, do your homework, don’t buy the hype, and keep on reading the Deep End.

Looking for modern launch or backoffice solutions?


Repool, Inc. (“Repool”) serves as an administrator to various pooled investment vehicles.  The content on this site, or any associated distribution platforms and public Repool online social media accounts, platforms, and site (collectively, “Distribution Channels”), is provided for information and discussion purposes only, and should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as legal, business, tax, investment, or other advice. Repool’s services and information available on Distribution Channels are not a substitute for third-party professionals (including properly licensed and/or registered lawyers, brokers and tax professionals), and you should seek your own professional advisers, including legal counsel. Repool is not licensed to provide legal advice and is not registered as a broker-dealer or investment adviser, and Repool is not otherwise licensed or registered.

Any views expressed in posted content, such as articles, blogposts, commentary, videos, or social media, are those of individual Repool personnel or third-party authors and are not the views of Repool or our affiliates, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Additionally, with respect to any content or views available on Distribution Channels, Repool makes no representations that the information has been validated by independent, licensed third-parties, nor that such information has any enduring accuracy or appropriateness for any given individual or situation.

Laws and regulations applicable to the sale of securities, forming pooled investment vehicles (including private funds), and investment management (including serving as an investment adviser or commodity trading advisor) are complicated and occasionally ambiguous. Relevant law may come from the state, federal, or international level, and you may be under the regulatory oversight of one or many regulatory bodies such as, but not limited to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It is your responsibility to ensure that, when forming, offering interests of and managing any pooled investment vehicle, whether supported by Repool’s administrative services or not, you are in material compliance with applicable laws including obtaining any and all applicable licenses, permits, registrations, memberships, and approvals that are required in order to form, offer securities of and manage such pooled investment vehicle.  You should not rely upon Repool in making any such determinations or as a replacement for licensed, third-party professionals.

Building the future of fund services

© 2024. Repool, Inc.